Editorial Feedback
At the C2 level, grammar is subjective. You must evaluate if a correction is a strict rule or merely a stylistic preference.
Grammar vs. Style
Register Shifts
Editors often rewrite to elevate (formalize) or lower (simplify) the text's tone for the target audience.
Resolving Ambiguity
Prescriptivism vs. Descriptivism
"That is the man I spoke to." (Natural / Descriptive) ✅
Critical Analysis ⚡
"Because it was raining..."
to
"Due to the inclement weather..."
"Exhausted from the run, the bed looked very comfortable."
Editorial Mission 🎯
Editorial Mission 🎯
Editorial Mission 🎯
The Editor's Mind
C2 Insight: Watch Teacher Sopheak analyze a piece of writing not for mistakes, but for *opportunities*. Learn how to accept, negotiate, or gracefully reject feedback in professional environments.
Debate the Grammar 🙋♂️
C2 Discussions
Brilliant observation, Sovan! In journalism or creative writing, active voice is king. However, in scientific and academic writing, the passive voice is often preferred. Why? Because the *experiment* or the *result* is more important than the *researcher*. "The solution was heated" is more objective than "I heated the solution." It's a register shift! 🔬
Can I reject an editor's change if I feel it ruins my 'voice', even if their version is technically grammatically 'safer'?
Yes, absolutely! At C2, you are a master of the language. If an editor tries to "fix" a preposition at the end of a sentence, making it sound stiff and robotic, you can (and should) use a comment bubble to say: "Stet (let it stand). I prefer the conversational rhythm of the original." However, you must always be aware of the "house style" of the publication you are writing for! 🏛️
My professor changed all my active voice sentences to passive voice in my research paper. I thought active voice was considered 'better' writing?